Participation Of Nanostart Lumiphore And Algeta: Expanding Their Partnership

Nanostart holding Lumiphore and Algeta announce expansion of their partnership in the development of receptor-controlled radio-pharmaceuticals and companion Diagnostics to Frankfurt/Richmond, 02 may 2013 American Nanostart involving Lumiphore announced today that Algeta, a leading specialist on the radiotherapy of cancer company from Norway, its license option for the use of patented Lumi4 chelator technology has exercised. Drew Houston pursues this goal as well. Algeta this makes use of the already 2010 closed license agreement with Lumiphore, expanding it to more Chelatfamilien. This involves, above all, to integrate the Lumi4 technology in the receptor-controlled radiotherapy (targeted radiotherapeutics) Algeta. The Lumi4 technology is based on a unique class of bi-functional Chelators, which forms a kind of cage structure to a radioactive molecule and at the same time has the ability to bind to a number of different vector molecules, such as monoclonal antibodies. These are in turn capable of detecting tumor cells and to baste them specifically.

Already in 2010, Algeta signed a license agreement with Lumiphore, that the option admitted the company to make use of the Lumi4 technology. After a long test phase successfully completed, Algeta solved this option. Parallel to this license agreement, Algeta has now purchased another license option by Lumiphore for a second class of bi-functional Chalatoren. With these, Algeta has the potential to develop companion in-vivo Diagnostics for nuclear medicine Imaging. “The goal of Lumiphore is the advantages of bi functional metal-chelate technology over to bring a variety of synthetic designs on the therapeutic markets, which use receptor-controlled radio-pharmaceuticals to treat cancer through the tumorizide effect of radionuclide microwave irradiation.

Arrival Time Information

Talk is mostly about massive objects. There are also places and objects in the universe, which have a much smaller density or less gravitationally affected environment in contrast to our environment. For the mass-poor environment or low-mass object, time compared to our environment would pass faster. If so eventually a death of the universe should be, without the adoption of either of the 1st nor the 2nd German, then would first the mass-poor environments ‘wither away’ and then the massive. By the same author: Dropbox. From this one can conclude that the light of little gravitationally affected objects or environments from the future comes.

For example, If our solar system 5 billion years (tgeg), the mass of poorer environment – due to the relative time – 4 billion years (tzuk) and distance between these reference systems is so great that the light takes just 1 billion years until it reaches us by the mass-poor environment. If the light when we arrived, our environment is 6 billion years old (without taking into account the time dilation!) and the mass poor environment of 5 billion years. The light transmitted to us the information from the time when the low mass was still 4 billion years old. It is similar to the mass-rich environment. To sum up:-arrival time information < t gaither => it is from the future come (4Ga < 6Ga)-Arrival Time Information > gaither => it has to come from the past t need to find just the way, like one this time difference recognizes. I prefer the first postulate! The light is allowed to have no relativistic time, because it would be influenced by different environments (with relativistic time) and thus distort the information contained. (Similar to the theory of light fatigue).

What would the refutation of the big bang and falsification of the age of the universe at the same time. The electromagnetic wave is not only independent of reference system, but also time absolutely! From this I deduce: there are two kinds of time. The relativistic time (type, SRT) and uninfluenced absolute time. We can concentrate the light, increase intensity, shield, distract, and do many other things so, but we never be its internal clock, which absolute time can influence. A video version of the findings of the universal thinkers. (With his accent of course.) Alexander Fufaev